Will Aleksander Čeferin seek a fourth term as UEFA president?
Aleksander Čeferin will stand for a fourth term as UEFA president, according to sources who spoke to the Press Association, as reported by ESPN. He would need re-election by European football's member associations.

Key takeaways
- ESPN reports, citing the Press Association, that Aleksander Čeferin plans to stand for a fourth term as president of UEFA.
- UEFA's president is elected by the national football associations that make up its congress, not by clubs, leagues or supporters.
- UEFA's statutes limit how long a president may serve, so the way earlier terms are counted decides who is eligible to stand.
- Whoever leads UEFA has a strong say over how the Champions League is designed, sold and how its revenue is shared across European football.
- No official candidate list, rival bid or election timetable is set out in the reported material, so these remain unknown.
What is being reported?
ESPN reports that Aleksander Čeferin, the current president of UEFA, intends to put himself forward for a fourth term in charge of European football's governing body. The report rests on sources speaking to the Press Association. The material available does not say that UEFA has formally confirmed a candidacy, and it does not include a statement from Čeferin himself.
This matters for a simple reason. No one has yet served a fourth term as UEFA president under the organisation's current statutes, which ESPN's description of the candidacy as unprecedented points to. A formal bid would therefore test both the rules on term limits and how much the member associations want continuity at the top.
Why is this in the news now?
A UEFA presidential election takes place at a congress of the member associations. Candidates have to be nominated within a set window before that vote. Reports about who intends to stand usually surface ahead of those formal deadlines, as national associations start to work out their positions and look for support.
The story has also drawn attention because Čeferin has said publicly in the past that he did not plan to seek another term. If the report is accurate, that position has changed. The reported material does not explain why, and any reason offered would be speculation until he or UEFA says something on the record.
How is the UEFA president chosen?
UEFA is the governing body for football in Europe. Its members are the national football associations, such as England's Football Association or Italy's federation, and not the clubs. The UEFA Congress is the organisation's supreme body. Each member association has a vote there, and the congress elects the president and members of the Executive Committee.
The president chairs the Executive Committee, which takes the main decisions on competitions, finances and regulations between congresses. That includes the club competitions: the Champions League, the Europa League and the Conference League.
UEFA introduced term limits after a period of turmoil in football governance. These rules cap the number of terms a president can serve. A later congress vote changed how a shortened term is counted. Čeferin's first period in office came when he finished a mandate left vacant by his predecessor. Under the amended wording, that partial term does not count towards the limit in the same way as a full one, and that is why a further candidacy is possible at all. Supporters described the change as a technical clarification. Critics saw it as moving the goalposts.
Who is affected, and how?
National associations are the electorate. Smaller associations receive a significant share of UEFA's development and solidarity funding, and they carry the same voting weight as the larger ones. That gives them real influence over the outcome.
Clubs do not vote, but they feel the result most directly through the Champions League. The president's agenda shapes the access list, which decides how many places each country gets and through which route. It also shapes the coefficient system that drives seeding, and the formula that divides prize money between participation fees, performance payments and value-based payments.
Leagues and smaller football economies are affected through solidarity payments. These are sums taken from club competition revenue and passed to clubs that do not take part in the group or league stage. How large that pot is, and how it is shared out, is one of the most politically sensitive decisions UEFA makes.
Broadcasters and commercial partners want stability. Champions League media rights are sold in multi-year cycles. A long presidency means the people negotiating those deals stay the same, and that also means continuity in the decisions on format and kick-off times that make the product valuable.
Where do informed observers disagree?
Supporters of continuity argue that UEFA has had a stable period of leadership. In their view it has defended the open, merit-based structure of European club football against breakaway proposals. They say the expanded Champions League format was agreed through UEFA's own processes, and that changing leader in the middle of a commercial cycle would bring uncertainty when the organisation can least afford it.
Critics see term limits as a principle, not a technicality. They argue that rewriting how terms are counted weakens the reforms that were meant to restore trust in football governance. Some also say that keeping the same leader for a long time concentrates influence, and that the voting structure rewards whoever controls the distribution of development money.
A separate debate concerns the Champions League itself. Some observers think the competition has become too generous to clubs already at the top, because coefficient-based payments reward past success. Others reply that without the elite clubs on board, a breakaway would become more likely. The reported material does not say where a fourth-term programme would stand on these questions.
What are the practical implications?
If the candidacy goes ahead and succeeds, UEFA's competition strategy will probably stay broadly on its current path. That covers the current Champions League format, the existing approach to selling commercial rights, and the existing balance between performance-based and solidarity payments. Clubs and leagues planning for coming seasons would face fewer sudden changes in direction.
If a challenger comes forward, the campaign itself becomes a forum for those questions. Candidates for UEFA's presidency usually set out positions on how revenue is distributed, how European places are allocated and how the calendar fits around domestic leagues and international football. Any of these could change the economics of the Champions League.
Whether anyone else intends to stand is not known from the reported material. It is also not known whether the formal nomination process has opened, or how individual associations plan to vote.
What should readers watch next?
- Formal confirmation. The report rests on anonymous sources. A statement from UEFA or a formal nomination would turn it into fact.
- Eligibility questions. Expect renewed scrutiny of the statute change on term counting, and of whether anyone challenges how it is applied.
- Rival candidacies. Whether a credible opponent emerges will show how settled the member associations are.
- Manifesto content. Any candidate's position on Champions League revenue sharing, access and the calendar will matter more to clubs than the identity of the winner.
- Relations with clubs and leagues. Watch how club representatives and domestic leagues respond publicly, since their cooperation shapes how far any president's agenda can go.
Frequently asked questions
Is Aleksander Čeferin running for a fourth term at UEFA?
ESPN reports, citing sources who spoke to the Press Association, that Aleksander Čeferin will stand for a fourth term as UEFA president. The reported material does not include formal confirmation from UEFA or a direct statement from Čeferin. Until a nomination is officially lodged or announced, the candidacy should be treated as reported rather than confirmed. Details such as an election date or rival candidates are not known from the available reporting.
How is the UEFA president elected?
The UEFA president is elected by the UEFA Congress. The Congress is made up of Europe's national football associations, and each one has a vote. Clubs, leagues, players and supporters have no direct vote. Candidates must be nominated within a set period before the congress. The person elected chairs UEFA's Executive Committee, which takes the major decisions on competitions, finances and regulations between congresses.
Does UEFA have presidential term limits?
Yes. UEFA's statutes cap how many terms a president can serve. These limits were brought in as part of governance reforms. A later congress vote changed how a shortened term is counted, which affects whether a president who first took office mid-mandate can stand again. Supporters called the change a clarification. Critics argued it weakened the purpose of having limits in the first place.
Why does the UEFA president matter to the Champions League?
The president chairs the Executive Committee, which approves the Champions League format, the access list that sets how clubs qualify, and the formula for distributing revenue. Those decisions shape how much money clubs earn, how many places each country receives and how seeding works. The president does not run matches, but sets the strategic direction that determines the competition's structure and finances.
Can clubs vote in the UEFA presidential election?
No. Clubs have no vote in the UEFA presidential election. The electorate is made up of the national associations that belong to UEFA. Clubs can still influence the process indirectly through their own national associations, through club representative bodies that negotiate with UEFA, and by voicing public positions on competition format and revenue sharing during the campaign.
Who could challenge Čeferin for the UEFA presidency?
The reported material does not name any challenger, and it is not known whether anyone else intends to stand. Any candidate would need to be nominated through a member association within UEFA's formal deadlines. Whether a credible rival appears will be one of the main signs of how united European football's national associations are behind the current leadership.
Sources and further reading
- ESPN: report on the intended candidacy, citing the Press Association
- Press Association: the original source of the information about the candidacy
- UEFA statutes and congress documentation: rules on elections, nominations and term limits
- UEFA club competition regulations and financial reports: background on Champions League access and revenue distribution